Health Care PublicPolicy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Health Care PublicPolicy - Assignment ExampleDuring the mid-2000s, the American Hospital Association (AHA) predicts that the United States would bugger off a shortage of employees serving the healthcare department. These workers include physicians, nurses, dentists, and medical interns. The healthcare workers shortages observed is due to the increased growth seen in the universe, the high trope of agedness patients such as the baby boomers and the rise in the number and occurrence of continuing diseases. This essay will explore the causes, which are responsible for the shortage of healthcare workers in the US, and remedies that have been put in place to help alleviate the shortage.It is important for the government to understand and identify the causes of healthcare workers shortages. Identifications of such shortages enable for rough-and-ready planning and coming up with solutions to curb the rise in healthcare workers shortages effectively. The following are some of the cause s that were determined to contribute to the scarcity of healthcare workers in the US.The increase in the demand for healthcare in the US is a great contributor to healthcare workers shortages. The demand increase is due to the rising community numbers (putting more pressure on the strained healthcare services), a large number of the US population growing old, and a large number of chronic diseases recurring often. For instance, the U.S. Census Bureau projected that the population growth of the U.S. will increase by 13 percent while the aging population will compromise 20 percent of the population by 2030. On the other hand, 50 percent of the population will be suffering from chronic diseases (U.S. Department of Commerce, 2010). These statistics show the massive demand for the healthcare givers that will be required in a few years. The current shortage being experienced will thus be magnified in a few years time.There is an inadequate growth

Hitler's greatest mistake Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Hitlers greatest mistake - Research Paper ExampleHitler was very much overconfident about invading Russia. The troop was not provided with winter garment or equipments. More than half of Germen troops were frozen to death. The invasion was started on three fronts, in the south towards the Ukraine, in the north towards Leningrad, and centre towards Moscow. The moves were initially considered as successful advances. Within few days the Luftwaffe achieved air supremacy. German troops started encircling Russian defenders. Nazi legions soon conquered 1200 tanks and 600 big guns. They also gained more than 150,000 prisoners. Hitler essay to control Russia to a great extent. Their crucial aim was to gain control over Leningrad-Moscow-Volga line. Germanys three-pronged invasion was intended for seizing production areas in Ukraine and the Donetz basin. Germanys plans were to acquire mineral deposits, oil and grain. They attempted to capture the Black and Baltic seas. Russian citizens were e ncouraged to accept the scorched policy. They were instructed that if they were forced to evacuate from their get off they should not leave anything behind. They should evacuate fully. Germans at the same time started feeling trouble as weather was becoming disadvantageous for them. Russian partisan groups were gaining volume as they began imposing big tolls on supply convoys. Germans gained control over Riga, Smolensk and Kiev. They invaded Stalingrad to acquire the oilfields of Cacasus in August 1942.

Medico Legal Aspects and the Radiographers Scope of Practice Essay - 1

Medico Legal Aspects and the Radiographers Scope of Practice - Essay ExampleThe councils conduct and competence committee provide a verdict on practices that contravene HCPCs set standards (HCPC, 2015).Incorporating the law into the field of medical practices gives an insight into the federal agency of the law. The force of the legislation is perhaps the reason for ethical and professionalism in medical practices. The very laws originate ethical concerns and the expectations that the public places on civil servants. This work examines a court case involving physicians and a patient, where the failure of a doctor to stick to the professional requirements caused harm to the patient. The work depicts the judicial proceedings about health matters and elaborates on the right procedures for handling issues at workplaces. The legislation, in this case, relates to the examination of the various health policies, which this work also explains.Based on court proceedings, the radiographer faile d to perform an X-ray on the patient. The radiographer worked for the Hertfordshire Hospital University Trust, where he was to give instructions to practicing students. The medical practitioner was supposed to be a role model to the pupils in the Radiography Course. The competence that radiographers expose the result from the periods of training they undergo. Power can carry out the actions of an occupation to the expected levels during the time for which you work (The University of Exeter, 2015). Training makes the people concerned to be some(prenominal) fits for the purpose and the fit for practice.The scope of professional practice requires that radiographers work using the safest and the most efficient techniques for the patients (Scope of Professional Practice, 2015). The patient in this case scenario was weak, something that the radiographer, Mr. Porter knew. He was instructed to fetch the patient from another ward and realized his inability to liberty chit by himself. He o pted to give the patient a wheelchair, which isthe best action for those who cannot walk (Long, Frank & Enhrlich, 2012).

EU Initiatives for Contribution to Health and Safety of Workers Coursework

EU Initiatives for Contribution to Health and Safety of Workers - Coursework ExampleContributions were made from the member states of the European Union. thither was a focus on indicators of health and recourse strategies including the extent and costs of occupational injuries and ill health, legislative arrangements, inspection, preventive services, and arrangements for participative management of health and safety and restitution systems. EU HSE directives and specific applications have been reviewed. Hazard has been defined as something such as an object, property of a substance, or a phenomenon or an activity that jackpot cause adverse effects. For example, the breathing of asbestos can cause lung cancer. Risk has been defined as the likelihood that a hazard will actually cause adverse effects, and the effects can be measured. The interpretation is in two parts. Likelihoods are expressed as probabilities, frequencies or in a qualitative way. Effects are described in some mea surable way (HSE, 2010). SFAIRP is defined as so far as is reasonably practicable or reasonably practicable. The HSE proceeding has led to legislation for duty holders to ensure so far as is reasonably practicable. It is a statutory obligation that has to be carried out in the shine of current knowledge if it is feasible, irrespective of cost or difficulty. The term requires a cost-benefit analysis to be used while determining actions that have to be interpreted in response to identified risks or comparison is to be carried out in similar circumstances. The preventive measures should be commensurate with the magnitude of risk (Institute of applied science and Technology, 2009). SFAIRP is also defined as it can be done, it must be done or practicable. It is a statutory liability in health and safety legislation. The legislation may be absolute or qualified by expressions for ensuring practicability. The courts make a determination as to whether duty holders have complied with thei r obligations.

Prospects and Challenges of the rules and regulations of the Saudi Research Paper

Prospects and Challenges of the rules and regulations of the Saudi-Arabian great(p) grocery - Research Paper ExampleDistinguishing characteristics take account of spreading out of the commercialize to a circle the clock global trading cycle, pact animalization, and augmentation in the rate of recurrence of contracts, incessant evaluations, and imitative markets. Antagonists argue that neo-liberalism is the functioning of comprehensive capitalism through legions or political science interference to guard the interests of multinational conglomerates, over and above this free trade also casts influences on wages and social structures.The Saudi Arabias Securities diversify Commission1 and the Saudi Arabias Stock Exchange (Tadawul)2 established by the enactment of the Capital Markets Law with authority to regulate all aspects of the capital market. The Government of Saudi Arabia has been qualification significant attempts to strengthen its regulatory and institutional infrastruc ture for capital markets since 2003. The Government of Saudi Arabia prepared and issued the Capital Market Law, which was concretizing in 2003, through the creation of the dogmatic Economic Council and the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority. These reforms should help galvanize the Saudi Capital market.3The major objective of this study is to identify the prospect and challenges of the rules and regulations of the Saudi Arabia capital market. The Government of Saudi Arabia has been making significant attempts to strengthen its regulatory and institutional infrastructure for capital markets since 2003. The Government of Saudi Arabia prepared and issued the Capital Market Law, which was concretizing in 2003, through the creation of the Supreme Economic Council and the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority. These reforms should help galvanize the Saudi Capital market. 3Objectives of the viewThe major objective of this study is to identify the prospect and challenges of th e rules and regulations of the Saudi Arabia capital market. In order to reach this objective, the sub-objectives include1. An overview of the Capital Market Law of 20032. An discernment of the contemporary equity market in the country 3. To conduct a survey of the overall institutional, legal and regulatory framework for capital markets. Problem educational activity Due to the number of banking and financial crises in the global capital markets, companies have created series of techniques in order to improve the market performance.4 The capital market of Saudi is not well diversified with such techniques as there exists a specialised securities regulator and the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA) that regulate the market and in this way restrict companies from many lucrative activities.5 Before enacting the Capital Market Law and other Regulations of Saudi Arabia, the capital market lacked some of the grassroots features of more advanced markets such as a designated supervis ory authority and a stock exchange with well defined functions.6 With booming oil revenues, government bond issuance is likely to diminish, causing a contraction in the supply of government debt.7 There are no controls on portfolio investment in Saudi Arabian government securitiesas well as there are other major problems with the Sauid Arabia capital markets that I will discuss in this dissertation. Since the enactment of the Capital Market Law of 2003, the Saudi Arabia Government has tried to promote reform programs in all sectors of capital market and these changes have been rapid. Among these measures has been the establishment of the modern Saudi capital market. The Saudi stock market is the largest in the region and with the enactment of the Capital Market Law, the way is paved for a full-fledged securities market. There is a lack of transparency in the market, whether it relates to a companys expansion

The Anatomy of Evil Essay Example for Free

The Anatomy of Evil EssayIn his Vessels of Evil, Laurence Thomas contends that the maniclike can do no evil (p. 98). Thomass view nigh the human relationship between evil and hallucination is common among laypeople, psychiatrists and philosophers. In this section I engage whether the insane argon precluded from transgression. Part of the problem in assessing the claim that the insane can do no evil, is that it is non always clear to whom we ar referring by the term insane.According to the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, the insane are people who are in a state of mind that precludes normal perception, behavior, and ordinary fond interaction they are mad, psychotic or mentally ill. However, by insane Thomas and others who argue that the insane can do no evil cannot designate anyone with a mental illness (i. e. anyone with a disorder listed in the DSM-IV), for there is no reason to hold that e. g. individuals suffering from Obsessive-Compulsive disorder or from wander er phobias cannot do evil.More than likely those who argue that the insane can do no evil mean something closer to the legal notion of insanity agree to which the insane are those who, at the time of acting, . are laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and role of the act they are doing or if they do know it, they do not know they are doing what is wrong (Clark and Fin, p. 210).This is the content of the famous McNaughtan Rules which abide come to dominate the common law on the defence reaction of insanity. However, one problem with the legal notion of insanity is that it is not always clear who is able to ascertain the nature and type of their actions or to tell that what they are doing is wrong. Also, it isnt clear that the legally insane will always be precluded from evildoing. In what follows I consider the relationship between various mental illnesses, legal insanity and our ability to do evil.I argue that the Desire A ccount of Evil provides a natural demarcation between those mental illnesses that preclude us from evildoing and those that do not. I contend that the legal notion of insanity is a less accurate guide. community suffering from delusions or psychoses are unable to discern the world correctly or to draw reasonable inferences from their perceptions (APA, pp. 273-281). They are like the citizen of Usville who cannot be expected to believe anything other than that the Notlikeuses are hostile vampires from another planet. standardised the citizen of Usville, delusional or psychotic schizophrenics do not have e-desire sets because they have good reasons for their false beliefs about the worthiness of the goals for which they desire misemploy or about the significance of the harm they desire. Thus, people who cause others significant harm because of delusions or psychosis resulting from their mental illnesses do not do evil for deuce reasons they do not do evil because their actions do n ot follow from e-desire sets and they do not do evil because they are not example agents.Besides schizophrenia, other disorders such as Schizoaffective Disorder, Delusional Disorder, Brief Psychotic Disorder, Dementia, Manic depression, etc. can involve psychotic or delusional episodes where a patient may discharge actions causing great harm to others because their mental illness causes them to believe that the goal for which they cause the harm is justified or that the harm they cause is insignificant (APA, pp. 273-315). In all of these cases no evil has been performed according to my account of evil.Also, people committing crimes under delusions or psychoses are often deemed legally insane by jurists and judges, for if we commit a crime because of delusions or psychoses we do not know the nature or quality of our actions. For instance, in 1843, Richard Dadd was deemed legally insane and frankincense acquitted of the brutal mutilate of his father because he had the delusional b elief that his father was the devil. In fact, almost all cases of legal insanity involve mental illnesses that include delusions or psychosis (Cleckley, pp. 514-527). People with divisible identity operator disorder have two or more distinct identities or personality states.Usually there is a primary identity which uses the name of the individual who hosts the identities. This identity is typically passive, dependent, guilty and depressed. Alternate identities, on the other hand, typically have personalities that contrast with the primary identity, e. g. they are hostile, controlling, aggressive, and lack remorse. Individuals with dissociative Identity Disorder experience alternate identities taking control in sequence, often denying knowledge of their actions to the other identities including the primary identity (APA, p. 84).It is reasonable for the courts to excuse individuals with dissociative identity disorder for their wrongdoing on the basis of insanity because the primary identities in these cases are often not aware of the nature or quality of the wrongful acts caused by their more aggressive identities, and the court cannot split the guilty identities from the innocent ones for the purpose of punishment. I also think that those who intentionally cause or witness someone elses significant harm from an e-desire set as an alternate identity have not committed evil.For in these cases the primary identity does not intentionally cause or witness someone elses significant or serious harm from an e-desire set, the alternate identity does. Thus, it is the alternate identity who acts evilly and not the primary identity. We must judge each identity and her actions independently. Perhaps the most famous and controversial cluster of mental disorders that can lead to significant harm are the antisocial personalities disorders.According to the DSMIV persons diagnosed with antisocial personalities must be at least 18 years old display a pervasive public figure of negligence for and violation of the rights of others since age 15 have displayed evidence of conduct disorder since before age 15 and have at least third of the following seven traits(1) failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors indicated by ingeminately performing acts that are grounds for arrest, (2) deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, uses of aliases or conning others for personal profit or pleasure, (3) impulsivity or failure to plan ahead, (4) irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults, (5) reckless disregard for the safety of self or others, (6) consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor monetary obligations, and (7) lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another (Ibid, pp. 646-650).Cleckley argues that psychopaths are not responsible for their actions because they often act against their own opportunism and are therefore irrationa1. For instance, psychopaths often appear to be hopelessly impulsive, and committing crimes they are sure to be incarcerated for just hours after they are released from wards they claim to detest.However, others, such as Vinit Haksar, argue that we can only judge the psychopaths seemingly irrational impulsivity as counter to his self-interest if we assume he has values roughly the same as ours. But, Haksar claims, we should not make this assumption since psychopaths may simply value committing spontaneous antisocial acts very highly, and value things that the rest of us value highly (e. g. relationships, careers, freedom) comparatively low or only as a means to carry out antisocial activities. Generally, psychopaths are thought to be criminally responsible for their actions and are tried for their crimes since they do not suffer from delusions or psychoses of any kind and they reason well enough. When psychopat hs commit crimes they know they are breaking societal norms and thus they seem to pass the McNaughtan test for legal sanity.However, some, such as Antony Duff, have argued that psychopaths are so emotionally and morally deficient that they cannot understand the emotional and moral significance of matters such as death, love, friendship and career for others, and so, they cannot understand how they provide reasons for acting and for judgment (Duff, p. 193). Thus, psychopaths do not truly understand the nature and quality of their actions since they lack the basic values and emotional capacity required for understanding morality. Duff concludes that psychopaths should be considered legally insane and not criminally responsible. Besides discussing the relationship between various mental illnesses and evildoing, I have also argued that we cannot equate those whose mental illnesses preclude them from evildoing with the legally insane.One reason we cannot equate these two groups is that i t is sufficient for legal insanity that we are unable to know whether our actions are wrong, while this condition is irrelevant to whether our act is evil Another reason we may not be able to equate those whose mental illnesses preclude them from evildoing with the legally insane is that we may be required to have a greater understanding of the nature of our actions to be criminally responsible than we do to be evil That is, if Duff is right that psychopaths are so emotionally deficient that they cannot sufficiently understand the nature and quality of their actions for legal sanity, then we need a better understanding of the nature and quality of our actions to be criminally responsible than we do to be capable of evil I do not argue one way or the other about whether Duff is correct in his insistence that legal sanity requires an emotional understanding of the nature of our actions. Instead, I argue that, regardless of the conditions required for legal sanity, for evil we must onl y have the perceptual, cognitive and deliberative capacities required for moral agency and for recognizing that we intentionally cause or witness someone elses significant or serious harm.

White House Essay Example for Free

White House Essay