Utilitarianism :: Philosophy essays

Utilitarianism This was written in responce to the following questions What is the principle of utility? Do you regard it as an adequate basis for judging the progress of companionship or the desirability of different social institutions? What atomic number 18 its virtues and limitations? How would a utile aproach to judging society differ from a more traditional example approach? The principle of utility was Jeremy Benthams idea on how society progresses through and through maintaining the greatest felicity / good for the greatest number of people. The ideology utilitarianism, was later on formed by John Mill who offered the phrase and an explanation with regards to its honorable implications. It sounds logical for a society to privation the greatest contentment or good for itself. In general we regard individuals who are well (cultured) and who do not do (bad things) to be happy and we respect them for it. However, that depends on what we pass (cultured) and (bad t hings) to mean. We have already seen that the idea of what is mor all in ally correct and the notions of what is (more morally correct) are philosophical, sociological and theological problems that almost every philosopher has tried to answer and all come up with varying responses. Everyone sees murder as being maltreat and as being an act that could not bring happiness or good. However, this does not account for those who like to kill. They are part of society, so does their happiness not matter? Now if you had a population of murderers or however people who did not necessarily kill but liked eyesight others kill/killed (maybe on TV or the movies), does their happiness still present a society of progress? I would hope not. To this Mill would formulate that I was probably right, but that people would not choose to withstand like that. Instead they would opt for a moral happiness. They would look for the (higher) levels of happiness like knowledge and culture. I would then r eply that he has each left our human nature or his timeline for people moving towards a (higher) level of happiness is insane. I do believe that utilitarianism is the means by which we live in general people do whatever they want as long as it brings them happiness (at least what they think is happiness). The particular is that we cannot truly equate happiness to being (good) so we cannot use it as means of judging progress.