A Comparison between Drug Policy as Social Control

Nicolas Beltran English wizard hundred one /Ms. Jackson March 13 2012 While reading Drug insurance constitution as well-disposed picture by Noam Chomsky and Crito by Plato I discover a similarity between the two. People in higher superpower puzzle modes of stabilizing populations. The governing body is customized to make deal give out and the less flushed ar targeted. The in bear onities of the govern handst atomic number 18nt dealt with but they for sure do exist. Laws are strictly enforced to populations where by and large black males live and populations where crime rates are high. Not wholly masses have to deal with the law the same way callable to social class.The regime has its own way of controlling people who are thought to be dicey. How does the government control people? The government is able to put fear in the hearts of people. Governments have try to take away programs which help people who are struggling. People cephalalgia about public assistanc e such as welfare because they take in it and the government uses the despicable populations weakness to their advantage. The government has its own way of silencing people who they feel might be a threat to people in higher power like Socrates.Socrates from Crito had information that might have endangered the government. That is the master(prenominal) reason why he was sentenced to prison. Both Socrates and Martin Luther pouf served time in jail. Neither of them were a threat to their communities. They were wise men who both were the voice of their communitys. The government seen them as on the hook(predicate) so they were killed. This is why I believe the governments selected method of keeping things stabilized is inequitable to the thought to be dangerous population. Countries are unfair when it comes to giving everyone equal rights.There are people who are superior to the law. Did you notice not one sentence in Drug Policy as Social Control said anything about targeted rich or white people ? I wonder why no upper class people are being arrested. No one is perfect and we know the woeful and dangerous arent the only people who get their hands on drugs. many an(prenominal) people get away with illegal transactions but they tent-fly under the radar because they are rich. The upper class people do the same things the less fortunate populations are doing by taking and selling drugs but are less likely to be imprisoned.In Drug policy as Social Control its specifically says none of this has anything to do with drugs. The main purpose in the so called drug control is to criminalize dangerous black populations. Our country is known to give people equal rights and freedom. It isnt as it appears as you can see our country has favorites and the poor are targeted. While the upper class seems more united the government makes the poor hate each other. The way the government works the less fortunate are setup to fail.Job opportunities are decreasing and so are hi re out wages. There are less support systems for the people who need them. The part of poverty is increasing while the rich get all the attending as their wealth keeps growing. In Drug Policy as Social Control it says, If we wanted to stop drug use in the linked States theres an easy way to do it. This means that the government can prevent drugs from getting into the country but they dont because it helps them control populations by using drugs to criminalize black men.Where is the justice in this method of controlling people ? In my opinion this is a setup. These problems reach out occurring in our country but there is no change. The voices of dangerous populations ordain continue to be controlled by the government. Hopefully one day poor and thought to be dangerous communities will not be acknowledge as what they are thought to be. The voices of these communities have been silenced for thousands of years, so has rescuer Christ. All these leaders have died for what they bel ieved in.