Healthcare in the United States Essay

wellness pull off around the conception is truly diametrical. The united States is a pluralistic, hole-and-corner(a)ly owned form. They ar applied science driven, and an redress based type of wellness c be. They soak up issues with the speak to rising versus the throng receiving benefits. Ger more, Canada, and peachy Britain all use a universal type of wellness cargon where they believe all citizens should throw away moderate rise to power to treatments. Germany uses socialized Health redress. Canada uses subject area Health Insurance that is divided among its responsibilitys and territories. Finally, Great Britain uses interact Health Insurance. Key Words Health c atomic number 18, linked States, Germany, Great Britain, Canada. The get together States of America is based upon principles set forth by our founding fathers. We the population by the people is one of the principles that we still live by today. This is a value that we implement in all sects of presidency, including health c be. The United States has a health address system that is mostly privately owned. The government usually steps in when needed. Such cases involve money for vulnerable populations, caudexraising, and discipline individuals in the health condole with field. There are many characteristics of our health boot system that are vastly diverse than other countries such(prenominal) as Germany, Canada, and Great Britain.While the United States healthcare is mostly managed by private sectors, their healthcare is predominantly run and financed by the government. Growth in science has take for an essential need for naked as a jaybird technology. Hospitals are constantly competing and advertising new technology. Why compete for new technology? Many healthcare set asiders and holders of heath care plans feel that in that location are capacious legal risks fox-to doe with when new technology has not been implemented. Other stakeholders that desire a dvanced technology are the patients and the physicians. Patients now desire to use new technology because they gestate that it has greater benefits than the old method. Physicians also want to tinker with the new tools that modern day society has developed. In the United States, access to health care is based on insurance coverage. You may receive the service with four major avenues. Firstly, the public may join a government healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid to receive benefits. Secondly, employers keister provide insurance to their employees. Thirdly, an individual with the means to afford healthcare may purchase insurance on their own.Finally, people maypay for function individually. However, there are some Americans who have chosen not to have insurance. In 2006, forty-seven million people (58.8% of the population) were uninsured, meaning they were not cover by any program, public or private (jblearning.com). When someone is uninsured they have a few options. O ne option is to pay issue of pocket for the individual services that they require. The second option is to access federal Fund Centers, and the third option is to pursue treatment for their acute illness. When a citizen receiveks treatment, hospitals are required to give them care due to the implement of The want Medical Treatment and Labor Act of 1986. This law states that a few tasks must be completed regardless of the patients business leader to pay the hospital. The patient must first be admitted to the hospital and because given a physical scan. Following the scan the individual should be given the appropriate care in order to stabilize them. Furthermore, a major characteristic of health care in the United States is the immoderate amount of money it damages to receive health care.As a nation, we spend more than any other country in the world on providing health care to our citizens. Although we are spending a pear-shaped amount of the countries deficit, we are seeing little progress in providing access to the masses. Healthcare is one of the largest contri preciselying factors to the United States GDP with a cost of over 2.7 trillion dollars (Sultz, 1997, p.1). With such cost, innovations and expansions are inevitable. The new technology has doubtless stand byed advance the longevity of peoples lives, but it has also raise the cost of being able to access the treatments. People with better insurance or a greater need for the service may thwart an unfair advantage in receiving these services. This advantage causes a moral dilemma for the physician and the Health Care Administration (HCA) staff. Physicians and staff need to desexualise sure that the old method is no longer as great as the new technology. This will keep costs down and lease for a greater amount of people to receive the treatment that they need. The United States is based on a health care system where individuals must purchase their own insurance dapple still paying taxes t o fund other government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. As with any health care system, issues may arise.A key issue deals with employers and employees. In many cases, employers provide a healthcare program to their doers. What if the employee is a part-time worker? In such instances, many employers do notoffer such benefits for individuals who are not on the clock full-time. As we all know, health care in the United States is the most expensive care in the world. The issues with this expense are many. While costs are already high, they are only going to continue to sky-rocket. Another issue with cost is that duration Americans are spending an outrageous amount of money, they are not reaping the benefits. Millions of Americans are still unable to receive the proper health care because they are unable to afford insurance. Unlike the United States, most European countries have national health care. The United States and European countries differ substantially in the way they conduct medical care for their citizens. These health care programs provide care for all citizens, known as universal health care. everyday healthcare is a blanket term meaning there are different sub-divisions that stem from this type of care. Germany, Canada and, Great Britain all have different types of universal healthcare. Germany is a socialized health care country. Socialized health care means that funds are contributed by employers and employees because of government mandates. The Germanic government is in overall control of all procedures. However, there are still private delivery programs that help with carrying out the health care processes in Germany. All Germans with incomes under 46,300 are required to enroll in one of the indisposition funds (healthcare-economist.com). Higher income citizens may opt for private care or join a federal sickness fund. The federal government decides what benefits to add to this package. Sickness funds are provided through a pay roll tax which is taken from the employer and the employee. Less than ten share of the population decides to use private insurance. Insurance and payments using the federal sickness fund are closely related in the socialized healthcare system.Many believe that carrying out procedures in this manner provides a more orderly healthcare in comparison to the United States. Canada uses a different form of healthcare known as the National Health Insurance System or commonly referred to as Medicare. This form of insurance was initially established in the Medical Care Act of 1966 providing fifty-fifty cost sharing (jblearning.com). General taxes collected by the government are what pay the healthcare system but private providers deliver the care. The government decides how the insurance plans ultimately work. Canada has ten provinces and three territories that carry out the functions of thehealthcare while the government oversees their actions. All Canadian citizens and permanent residents are eli gible for health insurance in Canada. Unlike America, Canadas system is built to aid peoples need for health care rather than their faculty to pay for services. Medicare is intended to assist all Canadian residents so that they have reasonable access to hospitals and physicians. Canada has a multi-part insurance plan for the provinces and territories. Each has comparable features and standards that come together to form Canadas health care plan. When a resident arrives at the health care facility they simply intend their health care card.Most services are covered by taxes paid to the government. However, in some cases you will need private health care because policies are slightly different when traveling from a province to a territory. Finally, Great Britains health care is provided through the National Healthcare Service. Like Canada, their system of health care is designed to help all the citizens receive health care. Great Britains system is publicly funded through general t axes of the people. For a single-payer health care system, the cost of providing care is relatively low. However, there are limited options in choosing your provider as well as a long delay list to see them. There are 750,000 Britons on the waiting lists for hospital admission 40% of cancer patients are never able to see an oncologist there is unambiguous rationing for services such as kidney dialysis, open heart procedure and care for the terminally ill(Healthcare-economist.com).This is why a very abject percent of the citizens choose t pay for private health care which is well-nigh the same as generic health care but with better care and quicker waiting times. This health care is almost the same as the generic insurance Great Britain provides but it has shorter waiting times and better quality care. Another feature of this system is that there are no deductibles and almost no co-pay. In summary, the United States has a very different system of health care than Germany, Canada, and Great Britain. The United States is private, whereas the other countries are mostly publicly run by the government. all system of health care has its pitfalls. Today, politicians and the public are trying to generate a way to maximize the efficiency of cost, access and quality.Referenceshttp//healthcare-economist.com/2008/04/14/health-care-around-the-world-an-introduction/http//www.jblearning.com/samples/0763763802/63800_ch01_final.pdfSultz, H., & Young, K. (1997). Health care USA Understanding its organization and delivery (8th ed., p. 1). Gaithersburg, Md. Aspen.